Definition: And he that hath his hair fallen off from the part of his head toward his face, he [is] forehead bald: [yet is] he clean.
Explanation: Okay, let's break down this verse from Leviticus 13:41. It’s a really interesting and somewhat symbolic passage about purity and holiness. Here’s the explanation in simpler terms: The Basic Idea: This verse describes a situation where someone has lost their hair, but they are still considered clean and pure enough to participate in religious rituals. It's a way of highlighting the importance of being completely free from impurity – both physically and spiritually – for God’s presence to be fully recognized. Let’s break it down word by word: “And he that hath his hair fallen off from the part of his head toward his face…” This is a key part. It means someone has lost some of their hair, particularly at the back of their head. “…he [is] forehead bald: yet is” – This is where it gets interesting. The word "yet" introduces a contrast. "Yet is" means “but is” or “still”. So, the person is bald (without hair), but they are clean . It’s a surprising statement! “…he [is] clean.” - This is the core message. Because they have lost their hair, it's considered clean enough to participate in religious ceremonies. What does this mean in context? This verse was part of a larger system of rituals and laws in ancient Israel. It wasn’t about physical appearance; it was about spiritual purity. The loss of hair symbolized a shedding off of the old, impure self, allowing for a fresh start and connection with God. It highlighted that true holiness came from a state of being free from sin and impurity. Symbolic Significance: Historically, this passage is often interpreted as representing a symbolic cleansing or purification process. It's like a metaphor for a spiritual rebirth – leaving behind the old self to be renewed by God’s grace. In short, this verse is about being completely free from sin and impurity, allowing you to participate in sacred rituals. --- Do you want me to: Explain another passage? Discuss a specific aspect of this verse (like its historical context)?